Jeff Probyn: Why I’m backing the WRU in showdown with regions

Wales v EnglandAs if the Greek tragedy of the European Cup was not enough we now have a Welsh suicide pact that seems destined to create mayhem across the game in the Northern Hemisphere. With and both currently being investigated by the EU over funding irregularities you would think it was hardly the time to be engaging in a high-stakes gamble with your major funding provider (the WRU) – but an offer from Premier Rugby Ltd (PRL) seems to have set them on a collision course.
The dilemma caused by the suggestion that PRL and BT will somehow combine to fund the four rebellious regions in place of the WRU if they don't sign the participation agreement, could have far reaching and damaging consequences for the sport as a whole.
Logic says that if the regions refuse to sign and the WRU follow through with its threat to disband the current regional teams, the WRU would probably form new ones to take their places in both the Rabo and Heineken.
That would leave the current regions no longer a part of the Welsh Union, so they would therefore have to apply to another Union for membership in order to be able to compete in that country's league system.
It is usual for any team that applies to join a Union to start at the bottom of the league structure and works its way up, something I am sure none of the current Welsh regions would be prepared or able to do.
If it were the English league system they joined and they started at the bottom of the league, working your way up to the would take years, even if you were to gain promotion year on year.
So unless they were to get a special dispensation from the that would be bound to cause a storm of protest from the lower leagues, they would be unable to fulfil any agreement to play in the Premiership.
If the WRU were to disband the regions, any agreement with the Premiership re promotion and relegation would also have to be reassessed because even if they were allowed to join the English leagues and were given that special dispensation to play in the Premiership, they would be subject to the RFU rules which currently include unfettered promotion and relegations.
It is highly unlikely that the RFU or any other Union would want to become embroiled in this row and would therefore be very reluctant to sanction the inclusion of any teams disbanded or abandoned by the WRU in their own leagues.
That could cause problems for the RFU considering it was PRL who it would seem have encouraged the regions not to sign but join them in a competition which at this time still doesn't exist.
What puzzles me is, even with the new BT deal, the vast majority of Premiership clubs will still struggle to break even let alone make a profit, so how can they afford to pay the Welsh regions £16m per season, unless they put the squeeze on the RFU for some extra cash.
I must admit to feeling a certain admiration for the stance that the WRU have taken despite the implied threats to its national side.
By drawing a line in the sand and sticking to it they are showing not just the regions but also the rugby world that they are in control of the game in and will do what they believe is best for as a whole.
The regions, if we believe what has been published, seem to think that by linking up with the Premiership and using the extra income generated to pay players higher salaries in an attempt to keep them in Wales would be good for the all areas of the game.
I believe that nothing could be further from the truth as all it would do is drive up the salaries for all when the reality is that none can afford what they are already paying.
If the regions get their way the game would become trapped in a never ending spiral of disputes between clubs and country over how the money generated by the international game should be split.
That would probably result in more being taken from monies put aside for the amateur game and development of the sport to help fill the yawning gap in the
coffers of the professional clubs as they struggle in a vain attempt to keep their star players from the cash-rich clubs in the French league.
Much as the regions would hate to admit it, it would probably be better for them if the WRU were to take over the elite players such as Leigh Halfpenny, and Alun-Wyn Jones with central contracts and leave them to fund the rest.
That could effectively reduce some of the regions wage bill by half enabling them to increase the size of their playing squads which in turn would improve their chances of success in both the Rabo pro12 and .
It would enable them to use some of the savings to fund the building of their brands and improving community work in a bid to increase their supporter base and help fill the stadiums on a regular basis.
It would also benefit the WRU as they would contract only Welsh-qualified elite players and have more control of the games they play, making sure that they are rested and prepared for internationals in the way that the national coach wants.
For players, there would be a security of tenure they don't really have at the moment given the doubts over the future of the regions, while ensuring that they will maximise their playing and earning potential by remaining in Wales.
For that to happen the regions would have to commit to the WRU but the truth is that if they want to survive and prosper, they really don't have a choice.

One Comment

  1. Well said Mr Probyn.
    The regions have simply lost sight of their reason for being, which is primarily to provide a level of rugby that prepares our players for international rugby. It’s the very reason they were set up and we moved from club to regional rugby.
    It might not be the worst thing in the world if a compromise wasn’t reached, the regions left and the WRU rebuilt but with 100% control. Taking a 100 year forward view of Welsh rugby with the national team at the heart of every plan or decision we make, a decade of turmoil would be a small price to pay in order for my children’s children to still be able to watch a competitive 6 nations and chat with their Grandad about it.
    As a small nation we have to adopt the NZ model and centrally contract a core group of players, including U21 and 7’s players so as to cover the regions when these guys are playing representative rugby in the same way as the national side. We also need to be able, as per NZ, to move players around the regions when needs must, from a positional point of view and we must also be able to control the number of foreign players i.e. no more than one non Welsh qualified player in a given position across four teams.
    We face the prospect of Mathew Morgan being sat on his backside once again this weekend whilst our crown jewel Leigh Halfpenny plays the unfamiliar position of outside half in the front line against one of the most fearsome packs in Europe, three weeks out from the 6N. What price an injury to Halvers?
    As Welshman I support my local team and Wales and whilst going to watch the regions and wanting them to win, the HC is vastly less important to me that the Welsh teams performance. That said with two young boys who want to see their heroes, simply letting the national players drift to France or England can’t continue. We need to pay them well enough that when combined with the honour of playing for Wales, it’s enough to keep them from going abroad and then we can introduce a properly enforced Gatland’s Law as per NZ. This can only be done once the pay is more aligned.
    Final thought is Peter Thomas is banging on about an extra Million quid a year for 3 years by signing up with the English but if memory serves they were getting an extra 3 or 4 million quid so the gap widens rather than narrowing so at best it would be a short term delay of the inevitable.

Leave a Comment